There is a difference between land and property. No corporation in bankruptcy can claim land (and all corporations as corporate sub-divisions of the master corporation are bankrupt); the limited property titles are only certificated titles, or deeds of trust, that are actually property of the United States and the other Nation States, and they in turn have collateralized all such property as pledge against the bankrupt estate.
A primary objective of The Ecclesiastical Court for the Kingdom of David is to form a comprehensive, robust, and
dynamic judicial system that raises the integrity of Law to the highest level available at this time on Planet
Earth. The Maxims of Equity will be fundamental to the application of judicial procedures within the D’Vida Private Society judicial system.
MEMBER QUESTION: I have read King David’s Brief In Support. It refers to the Court of the Ekklesia for the D’Vida Private Society. I presume this has been done in that court, instead of the Court of the Ekklesia of the Kingdom of David because it has to be independent of him.
Kim Goguen’s position as we understand it is based on a unique configuration/convergence of DNA, supposedly only occurring once every 2,000 years, in which she is purported to have every DNA line on the planet integrated in herself.
The Way You Do Equity Is You Accept Everything From Any Public Actor, Officer, Or Agent. The one power inherent in every commercial presentment is our unlimited Power to Accept. If you accept it, you don’t go into controversy. But you don’t “accept it for value”. That’s a commercial aberration. This is why the D’Vida documents, the Mandate and Writs, and instructions are created the way they are. Here is a point-by-point explanation of how it works: If somebody comes to your door and says, “I’m here from the Health Department. You are required to take this injection . . . ”, You say: “Great! I’m happy you are here.” With this attitude, you are not going into controversy and it defuses the entire situation. You don’t argue. (Everybody thinks they need to argue and that’s where one enters a field of battle. The system is set up so that we lose every time in a field of battle because we go into dishonor, we dishonor the presentment. If you look at the rules of the UCC, you can only do 2 things: You can honor a presentment or you can dishonor it). You don’t reject, you simply give them a condition, a precedent to your accepting the mandatory requirement. What we tell people on the website and in the instructions is if someone comes to your door and says “it’s mandatory, you have to do it”, you say: “Oh thank you for showing up. I appreciate it but I do not do any commercial business in person, only via the mail. I require your written authority with your wet ink signature and your supervisor’s wet ink signature sent to me in the mail.” If they say it is not a commercial business, you say “I am not here to argue the law with you. Are you qualified to make legal decisions here?” Of course they are not and will have to say so. When it’s sent in the mail it’s under Federal jurisdiction. In the United States, if it’s a fraudulent instrument, the United States will deal with it on their own terms as mail fraud. In other countries it would be good to research to find similar basis for federal jurisdiction over anything that is sent through the mail. Everything we do in the private aligns or conforms with the phrase “Let the Dead tend to the Dead.” Any item they send to you is a public document and a commercial instrument. It is from the realm of the dead. When we accept it and return it, we are sending their dead instrument back to them to settle. So we let the Dead tend to the Dead, we let them settle their controversies, let them settle their claims, liabilities and so forth. We stay in the private. We honor what they give us and we say to them, “We simply require it to come in a written form with your wet ink signature and that of your supervisor verifying your full legal and lawful authority to do what you say is mandatory.” You don’t threaten. You only give honor and that requires them to return honor. That is what is meant by “Going To Peace.” The power of going to peace is manifold beyond anything in the field of battle. They have to go back, put their wet ink signature on a written statement, and by so doing they’ve already put their liability on there – you don’t have to notice them of it. Sending Notices of Liability in any form is actually considered a threat and puts one in the position of being seen as a belligerent and enemy combatant. Doing what we do keeps us at peace in the public and neutral with all parties, thus not giving any manner of way to attack us. If somebody comes to your door and you say, “Great, send me this, signed by you and your supervisor, please send it to this address, and the address is: Kingdom of David, Attention John Henry Doe, c/o 1234 Main Street, Sometown, Anystate… They’re sending it to the Kingdom of David. You’re acting under the umbrella and sanctuary of the Kingdom of David. What you do is you accept it, follow the instructions in your D’Vida Welcome Pack. Write in the upper right corner of the document “ACCEPTED” (with quotation marks), the date and your signature. You have actually accepted the embedded equity that underwrites the issue of that charged instrument that creates a debt. Even if you don’t think a mandate order to do something medically is neither commercial nor creates a debt, they do in fact do exactly that. When they do the injections they actually create a bond or multiple bonds, underwritten by your underlying estate, and they make a lot of money on the trading of these bonds. So, when they say that is entirely not true. They are bonding us to further debt much more than the simple cost of the stuff shot into your arm. When they have this mandate, they’re creating a charged instrument with the franchise name that compels you as the surety to step up under public policy and perform the mandatory requirement AKA, take the jab. It is a charge just like any other charge. It has a monetary value. When you perform the duty, it becomes a discharge, which settles it. But the bonds underneath remain, and they are traded and generate a lot more than the charge on the surface. There is equity there because the estate that underlies the franchise is providing the secured value and the collateralization of that debt instrument. When you do full status correction, you have complete command and control of all of that. But it takes a serious commitment to fully correct one’s status. What we are starting with our D’Vida members is that you can still have the power of acceptance even if you don’t have any status correction under your belt,
Adjunct for Employment/Employer Situations to Accompany the Individual Mandate of Non-Consent and Sacred Writs Notice and Presentments
We are making a change to our use of the word Family on our documents based on updated information we have recently researched. To explain this point there is some important background and context to understand. Most of us are used to writing out our names with First Middle Last, and presume that our last name is actually our own. But, as with all things in the matrix, things are not what they seem. In fact, the “last name”, often referred to as the surname, is another form of bondage and attachment. There is a long history to this, which we will not go into right here, but suffice it to say that when Roman Civil Law was introduced into the North American continent, things were laid in place to use the surname as another form of bonded attachment to the intended global perpetual debt enslavement system. Keep in mind that Roman Civil Law is the law form of control, bankruptcy, and military occupation. It was laid in place during the classic Roman Empire period, when most of Europe was under Roman military occupation. It was then brought to the Americas through the Spanish Empire and its conquest of Mexico, Central and South America. It was brought into North America through the Napoleonic Code and the so-called Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and 1804. In the Napoleonic Code (which is essentially Roman Civil Law), the surname was established as a method to capture the civil body under martial law and rules of bankruptcy. This was eventually done through the states of New York and California that adopted civil codes in the 1870s. This is only a very brief synopsis to provide a foundation to understand why we separate the First Middle names from the Last. Our usual approach to this is to reference the last name as the House of Doe, for example. As we set up the Proclamation of Peace web site and the individual documents for the members to use for their protections, we considered the format of the name as John Henry, House of Doe. But we thought that for most of the D’Vida Private Society (DPS) members this might be a bit of a stretch to refer to themselves as House, so instead we opted to use Family. But since that time, recently we discovered that the actual definition of Family means the servants of the House. Of course, we all think of the word family as something positive, referring to our original family or our close friends and associates as a “family”. But now we know that this word has a much different connotation than the meaning we normally ascribe to it. So for this reason we are now using the protocol of House of Doe in our documents. The reference to House indicates a collective of people in sovereign capacity. It goes back to the concept of Lord of the Manor, as the land holding title holder vested with granted land from the sovereign of the realm. The word “surname” actually refers to the Lord of the Manor, the “Sir” holding title to the land, and the landless serfs on his estate would be given a surname under this authority and chattel property control. By separating our given names (First and Middle) from the family name, and now referring to that name as the “House of…” we are removing ourselves from the vassalage implied by the family surname, that links us back to Roman Civil Law as the law of the conqueror for the control of the contained civil body. For those who have already done their documents, it is not an issue to have Family as it was used, so these can be kept as is, or be redone to be updated with our now set protocol of House. After the explanation above it would be obvious that all DPS members will sign their individual mandate documents with their autograph and not their signature. Which means the given names of First Middle, printed or hand-written (cursive style) in either Upper lower case or in all lower case letters. If you wish to use the last name, it would be House of Doe.
